Share |
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts

Monday, March 1, 2010

Guys can make a game out of anything

About 15 years ago I was visiting one of my oldest and closest guy friends. By old, I mean pre-birth. His mother and my mother have been friends since they were six years old; he & I have been friends since he was 8, because that was his age when I was born...

Anyway, I was visiting him in San Diego on spring break, a rather perfect place to visit during Minnesota’s “spring,” which is really just winter plus, or winter, the extended version. My birthday’s in the end of March and we could still have sledding parties – there was that much snow in the northern tundra I called home for the first 18 years of my life. Truly, I loved growing up there, as my winter-sports skills are testimony to, but San Diego was an easy choice for spring break, especially knowing I’d have a friend to stay with.

But comparing Minnesota and southern California weather is not the intended topic of this blog. While visiting my SoCal friend in San Diego, I discovered a tangible fact about men. This is something I was exposed to prior to my visit, but I think it really anchored that spring week.

Guys can make a game out of anything. Or maybe “competition” is just as apt a word as “game.” Look at fantasy football. Only guys could make a game out of watching football. I’m not even going to bother doing an internet fact-check on this one, because only the male species could invent a game out of game-viewing.

My hosts in San Diego, my friend and his roommate, would spend hours – I’m not exaggerating here, they literally spent hours playing this game they invented that basically consisted of the following rules:

  • From a seated position on the couch
  • Throw a hacky-sack (about an 8-9 foot toss if memory serves)
  • Make said hacky-sack land atop a triangular-shaped speaker that stood about 4 feet tall, of which each side was approximately 7-8 inches (making the area approximately 12-16 square inches)

It’s harder than I describe, because a) The hacky-sack has a tendency to roll off the top of the speaker – no matter if the thrower bounced it off the wall first or tried for a direct landing; and b) It required a certain arc and delicacy that took a while to master. Once you got the feel, you still were only batting less than 500 (again, if memory serves).

Now I’m making fun a little of my male counter-parts here, but I must admit, I sort of like this about men. It comes in very handy when on long road trips, flights, camping, hiking or stranded somewhere.

But it makes me wonder – are men like this because they spent so many years of human evolution hunting, or were they good at hunting because they’re like this? Also, in today’s world, where hunting is no longer required for survival, are men just creating these games, competitions...even wars, because they don’t know what else to do with all of those subconscious hunting instincts that are still inherent in them? That seems to disregard our conscious minds, though. And unfortunately, I can’t think of any way to prove or disprove this half-baked theory.

What I do know is this: If medals were awarded, I would’ve received a bronze medal in the tri-hacky-tournament. Too bad there were only three of us playing, or I might’ve had bragging rights for the bar.

More Interesting Katie Strand World Posts

More Amazing Music and Posts at Katie Strand Music

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Bravo, Stephen Colbert & Co! and your Olympic Vancouverage

If you missed this week of The Colbert Report, you can watch episodes either on Comedy Central's website for The Colbert Report, Colbert Nation, or on Hulu (where you'll suffer only 2-3 commercials per episode. (No, I'm not sponsored by either one of these organizations, I just like to make things easy for my readers.)

Stephen Colbert and Co. (Co being his writers and staff) did a fantastic job this week not covering the Olympic games. They Vancouveraged them. But right here I'd like to just point out the absurdity of copyright law. Apparently, NBC paid $820 million for exclusive rights to use the "O" word. (No, not orgasms. Please see previous blogs for those kinds of topics, people! This is serious, olympic, athletic business here on this blog!) What this means, as far as this very un-legal gal understands, is that no other broadcast station can proclaim on-air that they're covering the Olympic games of 2010. Only NBC-owned-or-affiliated stations can say that. Also, no other non-NBC-owned-or-affiliated stations can even show the Olympic rings without risking being sued. Sillyness, huh? That's copyright for you. I wonder how that applies to print. I suspect it doesn't since newspapers seem to be freely reporting on the winter Olympics, but who reads a newspaper (besides online) nowadays anyways? Besides, of course, my parents... and anyone retired and over age 60. Don't get me wrong, I actually love newspapers. There's a fantastic visceral experience that comes with reading an actual newspaper (as opposed to reading news on the computer or watching news on television). I just love trees more than that visceral experience. Especially considering I would sometimes miss reading the paper on certain days and would subsequently feel a bit wasteful. If they printed newspapers on hemp, a crop that grows, aptly, like a weed, and actually replenishes the soil (unlike corn that reaps & drys out soil - please see the movies Food, Inc. & The Union for more) I might be more inclined to subscribe to a newspaper...but I digress.

Back on topic, here's how Colbert got around that little legality and are avoiding being sued.

Exclusive Vancouverage of the 2010
Quadrennial Cold Weather Athletic Competition...
Defeat The World!

Colbert's brother, who is a copyright attorney and recent guest on the show to advise little bro Stephen on said laws, said if he were the Olympic attorney he'd still sue for the aforementioned Exclusive Vancouverage of the 2010 Quadrennail Cold Weather Athletic Competition... but that Colbert would likely win.

Bravo, Colbert & Co! Not just for comedy or creativity, though you deserve high marks for that. But I celebrate you because you skirt (or luge around the fastest corner) the line of copyright legality (truly one of the most boring of all legalities - which really is saying something) in the name of humor, entertainment, and most importantly, supporting world competition and athleticism. Could we just do this whole athletic competition thing instead of war? We'd still get our aggressions out. Oh, wait. It's not as profitable. NBC's set to loose money on this one, and Halliburton simply would not tolerate that. War's more profitable than the Olympics. Chew on that next time you decide to exercise...Oh wait, chew on that next time you watch TV. Since if you're an average American, you're likely to spend more time watching television than exercising.